Ripoff Hobbit Game Playthrough! | Ashen’s Animation

31 Aug

To celebrate the premiere of the Hobbit, Stuart Ashen does what he does best: plays a cheap rip off game entitled ‘The Hobit’. Or ‘The Hobbitt.’ We’re not su…

This computer-generated animation highlights the multi-mission capability of the three naval destroyers being built as part of the Air Warfare Destroyer Proj…


Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1. Daring Do

    August 31, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    I typed on this keyboard. All? the animals on Noah’s Ark died.

  2. Quesosama

    August 31, 2013 at 1:51 pm

    I think we’d all like to? “Kill Bad Dragon!”

  3. MadnessIsRelative

    August 31, 2013 at 2:16 pm

    Just to clarify, 43 people of all walks of life who are only connected by a show they like to varying ways but usually? in a way that is in a calm sort of “hey, this is a nice show” all have their life cut short. Their families in mourning, any dreams they previously had now shattered, any life they could have lived no matter how important it could be to the human race obliterated. And you take it as an opportunity to celebrate. Bravo.

  4. oliverlam2123

    August 31, 2013 at 3:08 pm

    Is? the game real? Lol

  5. azpunisher9

    August 31, 2013 at 3:17 pm

    43 bronies died?? Yeah!!!!!

  6. Nuparu

    August 31, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    I about died laughing when I saw? this

  7. adicakes

    August 31, 2013 at 3:47 pm


  8. jinxedmodder

    August 31, 2013 at 3:51 pm

    I watched the video again.
    And? 43 bronies died.

    Not a bad day.

  9. alasdairhurst

    August 31, 2013 at 4:08 pm


  10. 617kittenchicha

    August 31, 2013 at 4:19 pm

    Ashes the guy who made this? vid

  11. Laird's Lair

    August 31, 2013 at 4:29 pm


  12. squeaky vp

    August 31, 2013 at 4:50 pm

    I? made a comment
    and 74 cows died

  13. Aaron Gosselin

    August 31, 2013 at 5:43 pm

    And Windows? XP 😛

  14. 617kittenchicha

    August 31, 2013 at 5:49 pm

    Ashes is? awesome

  15. Artrocker86

    August 31, 2013 at 6:11 pm

    It’s because freaking Huha didn’t? pay him enough

  16. Mason Ruks-Sanders

    August 31, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    Why is it he talks in? this one but not the others,or is there something wrong with my computer?

  17. GrumbleMonkey646

    August 31, 2013 at 7:15 pm

    I actually liked the hobbit, (Movie) althought I did enjoy the? book much more.

  18. acex222

    August 31, 2013 at 7:52 pm

    Is the? missing 8th bit used to worship the president?

  19. Essence Explosion

    August 31, 2013 at 8:46 pm

    Lool so? many dead animal

  20. likky1

    August 31, 2013 at 9:07 pm

    i wouldnt be surprised if someone actually made this into a real? game

  21. Count Orlok

    August 31, 2013 at 9:45 pm

    I was watching this as well as seeing what the GameGrumps were? up to in Sonic ’06.


  22. estlib

    August 31, 2013 at 10:25 pm

    in turn i replied to you

    6 hippos died


  23. Adam Thomson

    August 31, 2013 at 10:57 pm

    At end dragon eats all pepole waits five secs and 13 giraffes? died And then lol

  24. Cave Johnson

    August 31, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    I couldn’t stop laughing at? the end! XD
    And 13 Giraffes died. Oh FUCK OFF!

  25. DarkLink1996

    August 31, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    I replied to? you.

    and 1 wolf died

  26. Sergio Carmona

    August 31, 2013 at 11:51 pm

    Yes, the possibility exists, of course.

    If you served in the Parramatta know? the speed better than anyone. Ok, it was a pleasure chatting with you.


  27. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 12:10 am

    A circumstance could arise in the future where it may be purely out of necessity, that some of our? DDGs combine with a carrier group, there is that possibility.
    Lol yes public data, too bad I actually served on Parramatta in 2009. It can touch on 30 knots.

  28. Sergio Carmona

    September 1, 2013 at 12:45 am

    Yes, in any exercise with USA, the navies of allied nations (NATO, Australia, Morocco, etc..) can interact with carrier groups, but only in exercises. In case of a big war (not Iraq or Afghanistan) you? will not escort aircraft carrier, you will be assigned secondary missions.

    On this RAN website you can find the speed data ANZAC class.


  29. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 1:26 am

    Yes, yes I do. Especially a war in the pacific or Arctic circle, not going to mention possible combatants but I’m sure you could guess who. Also JMSDF in certain exercises have their DDGs combine with USN carrier groups.
    I know? for a fact that Anzac can touch on 30 knots. Don’t know if the ASMD upgrade would inhibit it’s overall speed.

  30. Sergio Carmona

    September 1, 2013 at 1:26 am

    Do you think in case of real war the Americans are going to let you get close to escort carrier groups?
    One thing is the exercises, in which the f-100 have accompanied carrier groups and other reality thing.
    The Anzac class goes to 27 knots due to changes in its? structure that increased their weight.
    Any vessel Aegis is always greater than any other that is not Aegis, the Type 45 can only dream to someday complete with weapons.

  31. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 1:27 am

    Funny your just producing unrelated and facile points on the spot to suit your own argument.
    But overall, you’re completely missing the point here, I was never implying that speed plays an impact in modern naval warfare, the chances of DDGs opening up on each other with cannon is slim to none. What I AM saying however, is speed in CERTAIN scenarios WILL play an important role when fleets need to reach destinations? which are of significant importance, there is no debating this.

  32. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 1:40 am

    Again you proof me right! cannon fire is useless except for low level asimetric war. like with speed, the sice of guns have being reduced, in the 40s ships had lots and they where up to 46cm/18,1 guns, now they only have one with 12,7 or 105cm

    get uppdated!

    This conversation is? over and useless

  33. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 2:22 am

    We have NULKA? to assist with missile interception, speed is not even a factor when it comes to missile avoidance, cannon fire on the other hand.

    And speed can be important in many scenarios, not saying it is the be all and end all however.

  34. 9phyok32

    September 1, 2013 at 3:17 am

    i don’t think this air defence destroyer is as capable as the? type 45 of the royal navy.

  35. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 3:58 am

    I don´t know it all, but in this case, i know more than you

    Speed is not? so important, it was when they fought with gun fire, now with missiles, there are many other things tho lay on, than speed.
    Ask your navy to buy 1930s Fantasque class destroyers to hide from a hypersonic missile at 45Kn

  36. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 4:11 am

    How’s that? for nonsense, stop assuming you know everything.

  37. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 5:00 am

    Lol Australia will be expected to escort US carrier groups in the not too distant future, we already do? in certain joint exercises, as will JSDF and other Pacific powers allied to the US. And Anzacs were able to exceed 30knots contrary to what is available online, I should I served on one -_-. Keep in mind that older WW2 ships didn’t have modern day systems and equipment like todays DDGs, only a small space can be dedicated to engine capacity whereas back in WW2 it was almost top tier priority

  38. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 5:39 am

    You´re proving me right!

    As i said yankee carriers are the only mothern ones that reach 30 knots, there for, theyr companion the Arleigh Burke ones, have to be able to reach that? speed too.

    I also said, older ships like the 1943 C-destroyers where faster tan modern ones with the exception shown and argued above

    Hobart class is mostly meant to escort the Camberra class wich top speed is 21 knots. there you see the importance of speed (none)

    Stop arguing nosense

  39. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 6:27 am

    Oh? please –
    Displacement of an Arleigh Burke -ovewr 9000 tons 30+knots
    Displacement of a British C-class destroyer -over 2500 tons 35+knots

    And I wasn’t an officer, I worked for a living.

  40. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 6:58 am

    Answer me, some things

    Do you think that today navies can´t buy 45? knots destroyers or faster?

    Because they did 80 years ago. Then..

    WHY THEY DON¨T BUY THEM? (speed is less important)

    Answer if you can, and you will understand.But if you are unable, don´t worry
    Whatever you say Captain!

  41. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 7:58 am

    In? situations where a carrier group would be required to go full forward, which there would undoubtedly be in the near future, it simply could not do so.

    But it really does depend on the urgency of the situation, and you forget about RAS, ships do not need to come alongside to replenish fuel supplies.

  42. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 8:23 am

    Carrier groups move at arround 21 knots or slowler, unless you want to be out of fuel, only yankee nuclear carriers or older? ones are able to move faster than 30 knots, speed is not as necesary as it was

  43. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 8:33 am

    3 knots is a big difference when escorting a carrier group half way around? the world.

  44. Mad69sur

    September 1, 2013 at 8:38 am

    3 knots? is not a big diference when you are threatened by a plane or a hipersonic missile, in WWII there where destroyers able of 45Knots as in the 80´s there where fighters able of mach3. Things have change since then

    Thanks for buying in Spain

  45. KonradAdenauerJr

    September 1, 2013 at 8:54 am

    Very informative… and? nice animations, too.

  46. McMeevin

    September 1, 2013 at 9:02 am

    Still? not as fast as ANZAC.

  47. Sergio Carmona

    September 1, 2013 at 9:19 am

    Harpoon or SCALP naval because the Tomahawks needs autorization of? US Navy for use.

  48. amaama amama

    September 1, 2013 at 9:31 am

    Nice ship:) What is? the type of the SSM carried?