In the confines of a London dinner party, comedian Tim Minchin argues with a hippy named Storm. While Storm herself may not be converted, audiences from Lond…
Tim Minchin’s Storm the Animated Movie
15
Sep
Pages
Archives
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
Categories
- 3DS Max (4)
- Animation (247)
- AutoAnim (237)
- AutoMotionGFX (245)
- AutoVFX (28)
- justImported (32)
- Maya (7)
- Modeling (9)
- Motion Graphics (783)
- Showreels (1)
Jared Frick
September 15, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Wish I could? show this at school.
Kia The Dead
September 15, 2013 at 12:38 pm
I should have trusted your word.?
seeareess
September 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm
Yes, identification is a major factor? for enticing us into a story.
Devon Womack
September 15, 2013 at 1:25 pm
3rd time watching, still fucking? impressive:)
j9ca501
September 15, 2013 at 1:33 pm
All of the comments that this is “sexist” are baffling to me. Storm is a pretty women. But in an interview, he has said this is based on a real? dinner party with a real women. At that dinner he, as a polite well mannered person, said nothing about this women and her silly ideas. After he did what he gets paid to do, and wrote a beat poem.
Martin Brown
September 15, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Yes I agree, unfortunately it doesn’t stop studies influenced by these things being published as “Science”…..? Thats my point.
Sérgio L Tavares Filho
September 15, 2013 at 1:51 pm
I’m sure you? hear worse things about people in religious cults.
Sérgio L Tavares Filho
September 15, 2013 at 2:04 pm
Can you directly quote the verbal aggressions to? her looks? I cannot find them.
Sérgio L Tavares Filho
September 15, 2013 at 2:39 pm
But then it’s not “science”, it’s greed, pride, politics and? propaganda.
Sérgio L Tavares Filho
September 15, 2013 at 3:06 pm
Good point. I just went yesterday to a seminar that showed an interesting quote: Fiction is enticing? because it could be anyone — even you.
David Nelson
September 15, 2013 at 4:05 pm
I used to but my kid to bed with? this
Rablah17
September 15, 2013 at 4:35 pm
Where can I get the backing track for this??
pazi
September 15, 2013 at 5:20 pm
F*uck? me. I just went and watched this YET AGAIN, because someone quoted a tiny bit of the rant somewhere. Another 10 minutes well spent.
Andrea Giallombardo
September 15, 2013 at 6:01 pm
Brilliant!?
roesler
September 15, 2013 at 6:06 pm
Hats off to? you, team, hats off to you Mr. Minchin. I’m blown away.
vali222333222
September 15, 2013 at 7:02 pm
Richard? Dawkins @5:35 :))))
Martin Brown
September 15, 2013 at 7:21 pm
Yes? – Exactly that. And all of the other pumps they have added over the years haha. Such mechanical reductionist thinking has no place in modern science. It was clearly demonstrated as early as the 1940s-50s that that idea doesn’t work. I’m very pro science but the whole process is being tarnished. The science community needs an overhaul. Anyway, I’m not going to get further into this here, A debate on cell pump theory is not something i’m willing to discuss on youtube….Bye
rossbagley
September 15, 2013 at 7:45 pm
If you want to redefine? “magic” to mean anything of mystery, then the word “magic” has become a category including deceptions and unknowns. Which makes use of the word more confusing instead of less confusing.
Easier just to keep “magic” to mean “deception (sometimes pleasing)” and leave unknowns as unknowns.
rossbagley
September 15, 2013 at 8:23 pm
Interestingly, Minchin already responded to your comment at 5:43.
As a clarification, Minchin is anything but patronizing. He’s annoyed with the irrational, which? you seem to be declaring as your side of the argument.
Tau-Mu Yi
September 15, 2013 at 8:53 pm
This is just fantastic! One of my fave videos of all-time!? Thank you Tim.
seeareess
September 15, 2013 at 8:54 pm
Fair enough.? That’s part of the process. What pump theory do you mean? The sodium-potassium pump?
Martin Brown
September 15, 2013 at 9:08 pm
I agree, a process.
“Badly done work can always be unmasked” I agree again, it can be unmasked, but? often at the cost of being pushed out and discredited. Money talks. My main point was there are many ideas that need to be revisited, some from decades even ideas established hundreds of years ago. They are “Accepted”. I will give one example – Cell pump theory taught in biology at universities – Repeatedly demonstrated to not actually stand up scientifically.
Marcel Samyn
September 15, 2013 at 9:27 pm
“Every mystery ever solved turned out to be not magic”—wouldn’t you define “magic” as a mystery, so that this is by definition true? That would mean things CAN be magic, so long as we don’t know what they? are.
teababe27
September 15, 2013 at 9:53 pm
I? loved this video.
seeareess
September 15, 2013 at 10:07 pm
Science is a process. It is not perfect, but if done well there’s consistency and replicability. Great minds lead good ones in science, that’s how it works. Not? all scientists are talented, just like there are good and not so good teachers, there are mediocre scientists. Mistakes are made, some honest, some less than honest. But the thing about science is that badly done work can always be unmasked. That’s part of the process.