
To celebrate the premiere of the Hobbit, Stuart Ashen does what he does best: plays a cheap rip off game entitled ‘The Hobit’. Or ‘The Hobbitt.’ We’re not su…
This computer-generated animation highlights the multi-mission capability of the three naval destroyers being built as part of the Air Warfare Destroyer Proj…
I typed on this keyboard. All? the animals on Noah’s Ark died.
I think we’d all like to? “Kill Bad Dragon!”
Just to clarify, 43 people of all walks of life who are only connected by a show they like to varying ways but usually? in a way that is in a calm sort of “hey, this is a nice show” all have their life cut short. Their families in mourning, any dreams they previously had now shattered, any life they could have lived no matter how important it could be to the human race obliterated. And you take it as an opportunity to celebrate. Bravo.
Is? the game real? Lol
43 bronies died?? Yeah!!!!!
I about died laughing when I saw? this
WHAT? AN EXCELLENT QUESTION
I watched the video again.
And? 43 bronies died.
Not a bad day.
Who??
Ashes the guy who made this? vid
Who?
?
I? made a comment
and 74 cows died
And Windows? XP 😛
Ashes is? awesome
It’s because freaking Huha didn’t? pay him enough
Why is it he talks in? this one but not the others,or is there something wrong with my computer?
I actually liked the hobbit, (Movie) althought I did enjoy the? book much more.
Is the? missing 8th bit used to worship the president?
Lool so? many dead animal
i wouldnt be surprised if someone actually made this into a real? game
I was watching this as well as seeing what the GameGrumps were? up to in Sonic ’06.
…MILLIONS ARE DEAD!!
in turn i replied to you
6 hippos died
?
At end dragon eats all pepole waits five secs and 13 giraffes? died And then lol
I couldn’t stop laughing at? the end! XD
And 13 Giraffes died. Oh FUCK OFF!
I replied to? you.
and 1 wolf died
Yes, the possibility exists, of course.
If you served in the Parramatta know? the speed better than anyone. Ok, it was a pleasure chatting with you.
Regards.
A circumstance could arise in the future where it may be purely out of necessity, that some of our? DDGs combine with a carrier group, there is that possibility.
Lol yes public data, too bad I actually served on Parramatta in 2009. It can touch on 30 knots.
Yes, in any exercise with USA, the navies of allied nations (NATO, Australia, Morocco, etc..) can interact with carrier groups, but only in exercises. In case of a big war (not Iraq or Afghanistan) you? will not escort aircraft carrier, you will be assigned secondary missions.
On this RAN website you can find the speed data ANZAC class.
navy.gov.au/fleet/ships-boats-craft/ffh
Regards.
Yes, yes I do. Especially a war in the pacific or Arctic circle, not going to mention possible combatants but I’m sure you could guess who. Also JMSDF in certain exercises have their DDGs combine with USN carrier groups.
I know? for a fact that Anzac can touch on 30 knots. Don’t know if the ASMD upgrade would inhibit it’s overall speed.
Do you think in case of real war the Americans are going to let you get close to escort carrier groups?
One thing is the exercises, in which the f-100 have accompanied carrier groups and other reality thing.
The Anzac class goes to 27 knots due to changes in its? structure that increased their weight.
Any vessel Aegis is always greater than any other that is not Aegis, the Type 45 can only dream to someday complete with weapons.
Funny your just producing unrelated and facile points on the spot to suit your own argument.
But overall, you’re completely missing the point here, I was never implying that speed plays an impact in modern naval warfare, the chances of DDGs opening up on each other with cannon is slim to none. What I AM saying however, is speed in CERTAIN scenarios WILL play an important role when fleets need to reach destinations? which are of significant importance, there is no debating this.
Again you proof me right! cannon fire is useless except for low level asimetric war. like with speed, the sice of guns have being reduced, in the 40s ships had lots and they where up to 46cm/18,1 guns, now they only have one with 12,7 or 105cm
get uppdated!
This conversation is? over and useless
We have NULKA? to assist with missile interception, speed is not even a factor when it comes to missile avoidance, cannon fire on the other hand.
And speed can be important in many scenarios, not saying it is the be all and end all however.
i don’t think this air defence destroyer is as capable as the? type 45 of the royal navy.
I don´t know it all, but in this case, i know more than you
Speed is not? so important, it was when they fought with gun fire, now with missiles, there are many other things tho lay on, than speed.
Ask your navy to buy 1930s Fantasque class destroyers to hide from a hypersonic missile at 45Kn
How’s that? for nonsense, stop assuming you know everything.
Lol Australia will be expected to escort US carrier groups in the not too distant future, we already do? in certain joint exercises, as will JSDF and other Pacific powers allied to the US. And Anzacs were able to exceed 30knots contrary to what is available online, I should I served on one -_-. Keep in mind that older WW2 ships didn’t have modern day systems and equipment like todays DDGs, only a small space can be dedicated to engine capacity whereas back in WW2 it was almost top tier priority
You´re proving me right!
As i said yankee carriers are the only mothern ones that reach 30 knots, there for, theyr companion the Arleigh Burke ones, have to be able to reach that? speed too.
I also said, older ships like the 1943 C-destroyers where faster tan modern ones with the exception shown and argued above
Hobart class is mostly meant to escort the Camberra class wich top speed is 21 knots. there you see the importance of speed (none)
Stop arguing nosense
Oh? please –
Displacement of an Arleigh Burke -ovewr 9000 tons 30+knots
Displacement of a British C-class destroyer -over 2500 tons 35+knots
And I wasn’t an officer, I worked for a living.
Answer me, some things
Do you think that today navies can´t buy 45? knots destroyers or faster?
Because they did 80 years ago. Then..
WHY THEY DON¨T BUY THEM? (speed is less important)
Answer if you can, and you will understand.But if you are unable, don´t worry
Whatever you say Captain!
In? situations where a carrier group would be required to go full forward, which there would undoubtedly be in the near future, it simply could not do so.
But it really does depend on the urgency of the situation, and you forget about RAS, ships do not need to come alongside to replenish fuel supplies.
Carrier groups move at arround 21 knots or slowler, unless you want to be out of fuel, only yankee nuclear carriers or older? ones are able to move faster than 30 knots, speed is not as necesary as it was
3 knots is a big difference when escorting a carrier group half way around? the world.
3 knots? is not a big diference when you are threatened by a plane or a hipersonic missile, in WWII there where destroyers able of 45Knots as in the 80´s there where fighters able of mach3. Things have change since then
Thanks for buying in Spain
Very informative… and? nice animations, too.
Still? not as fast as ANZAC.
Harpoon or SCALP naval because the Tomahawks needs autorization of? US Navy for use.
Nice ship:) What is? the type of the SSM carried?